๐Ÿ”ฅ

Dialectic ยท Saturday, September 5, 2026

Knowledge as Justified True Belief

Analytic Epistemology — Plato to Gettier

The claim

"To know that P is to (1) believe P, (2) for P to be true, and (3) to have justification for believing P."

โ€” The classical analysis (attributed to Plato, Theaetetus 201d)

The premises that support it

  1. Knowledge requires belief — you cannot know what you do not believe.
  2. Knowledge requires truth — you cannot know what is false.
  3. Knowledge requires justification — a lucky guess is not knowledge.

The counter-example

Smith justifiably believes 'The person who will get the job has ten coins in their pocket.' His justification: he counted Jones's coins and was told Jones got the job. But Smith himself gets the job — and Smith also happens to have ten coins in his pocket. His belief is true, justified, and yet seems not to count as knowledge.

Which premise does the counter-example most threaten?

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload X

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.